<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ClickBrain</title>
	<link>http://clickbrain.com</link>
	<description>Web application reviews, marketing, and strategy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Demise of Value at Motley Fool by Brad</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2008/06/27/the-demise-of-value-at-motley-fool/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Brad</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2008/06/27/the-demise-of-value-at-motley-fool/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Bravo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tools for those incapable of creating their own quality content by Brad</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/23/tools-for-those-incapable-of-creating-their-own-quality-content/#comment-13</link>
		<author>Brad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/23/tools-for-those-incapable-of-creating-their-own-quality-content/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting. 

I know exactly what it is and looked at it before I wrote the post.  It is exactly what I thought. It is called gaming the system. The idea is to publish your article to a bunch of useless directories on the web in order to increase your ranks while making each article seem different, yada yada yada.  It is a waste of web and bandwidth and fills the web with useless crap that cheapens the experience. I understand you think because it tries to keep your content readable and useful that somehow that makes it OK to game the system, but it is not. The idea here is to use your web site to create quality content that people are seeking and if it is good enough, others will quote you and link to it. It is a very simple concept and it should be honored. Some folks don't want to actually work anymore and they would rather cheat than create something of value. Article directories are just as useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting. </p>
<p>I know exactly what it is and looked at it before I wrote the post.  It is exactly what I thought. It is called gaming the system. The idea is to publish your article to a bunch of useless directories on the web in order to increase your ranks while making each article seem different, yada yada yada.  It is a waste of web and bandwidth and fills the web with useless crap that cheapens the experience. I understand you think because it tries to keep your content readable and useful that somehow that makes it OK to game the system, but it is not. The idea here is to use your web site to create quality content that people are seeking and if it is good enough, others will quote you and link to it. It is a very simple concept and it should be honored. Some folks don&#8217;t want to actually work anymore and they would rather cheat than create something of value. Article directories are just as useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tools for those incapable of creating their own quality content by Todd</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/23/tools-for-those-incapable-of-creating-their-own-quality-content/#comment-12</link>
		<author>Todd</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 05:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/23/tools-for-those-incapable-of-creating-their-own-quality-content/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I'm assuming you don't have a handle on what Jetspinner is designed to do.

If you submit articles to hundreds of directories (like many webmasters do) Google only indexes a few of the distributed articles because they're generally viewed as duplicate content.

To avoid this filter you can spend an hour or 2 and break your article into snippets, you can then take these snippets and provide alternate versions for Jetspinner to use.

Jetspinner will take this seed article and create hundreds of unique versions each 30% or so unique, enough for Google not to penalize them.

Give it a try instead of knocking it without any facts.

Jetspinner is FARRR from a 100% automated spinning system that randomly spits out junk and throws in thesaurus replacements that it appears you think it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming you don&#8217;t have a handle on what Jetspinner is designed to do.</p>
<p>If you submit articles to hundreds of directories (like many webmasters do) Google only indexes a few of the distributed articles because they&#8217;re generally viewed as duplicate content.</p>
<p>To avoid this filter you can spend an hour or 2 and break your article into snippets, you can then take these snippets and provide alternate versions for Jetspinner to use.</p>
<p>Jetspinner will take this seed article and create hundreds of unique versions each 30% or so unique, enough for Google not to penalize them.</p>
<p>Give it a try instead of knocking it without any facts.</p>
<p>Jetspinner is FARRR from a 100% automated spinning system that randomly spits out junk and throws in thesaurus replacements that it appears you think it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Opens Performance-Based System to Qualified Ad Buyers by Brad</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/21/google-opens-performance-based-system-to-qualified-ad-buyers/#comment-9</link>
		<author>Brad</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/21/google-opens-performance-based-system-to-qualified-ad-buyers/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by. So people can click your URL, here it is again &lt;a HREF="http://www.clickfraudnetwork.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Click Fraud Network&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by. So people can click your URL, here it is again <a HREF="http://www.clickfraudnetwork.com" rel="nofollow">Click Fraud Network</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Opens Performance-Based System to Qualified Ad Buyers by LoriWeiman</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/21/google-opens-performance-based-system-to-qualified-ad-buyers/#comment-8</link>
		<author>LoriWeiman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/21/google-opens-performance-based-system-to-qualified-ad-buyers/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Fraudsters are always looking for ways to make money. The ad model does not change that.  CPA brings on fraud in the transaction through spoofing an identity in a lead form, downloading a white paper, or credit card fraud.  The FBI caught a ring of CPA fraudsters last year in California.  The problem is actually worse with CPA.  A spoofed identity will not be detected until a marketer or sales person attempts to make contact.  By then, it is very difficult to trace the fraudlent lead back to the lead source.

The best way to mitigate fraud risk is to track campaigns carefully, and have a third party auditor watch for bad behaviors.  

For a free fraud diagnosis, your readers can try: wwww.clickfraudnetwork.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fraudsters are always looking for ways to make money. The ad model does not change that.  CPA brings on fraud in the transaction through spoofing an identity in a lead form, downloading a white paper, or credit card fraud.  The FBI caught a ring of CPA fraudsters last year in California.  The problem is actually worse with CPA.  A spoofed identity will not be detected until a marketer or sales person attempts to make contact.  By then, it is very difficult to trace the fraudlent lead back to the lead source.</p>
<p>The best way to mitigate fraud risk is to track campaigns carefully, and have a third party auditor watch for bad behaviors.  </p>
<p>For a free fraud diagnosis, your readers can try: wwww.clickfraudnetwork.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sales Machine &#187; More Really Useful Marketing Rules on BNET by Leslie</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/19/sales-machine-more-really-useful-marketing-rules-on-bnet/#comment-6</link>
		<author>Leslie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/19/sales-machine-more-really-useful-marketing-rules-on-bnet/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Very nice to hear your comments on BNET! We're paying attention to what you and others are saying so we can keep on delivering what you need (instead of what we think you need!). 

I'll be sure to pass along your comments to the author, Geoffrey James.

Leslie Leite
BNET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice to hear your comments on BNET! We&#8217;re paying attention to what you and others are saying so we can keep on delivering what you need (instead of what we think you need!). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be sure to pass along your comments to the author, Geoffrey James.</p>
<p>Leslie Leite<br />
BNET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving to Word Press - Previous Version Still Available by Brad</title>
		<link>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/02/moving-to-word-press-previous-version-still-available/#comment-2</link>
		<author>Brad</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://clickbrain.com/2007/06/02/moving-to-word-press-previous-version-still-available/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Comments are what make this site a community. Please provide your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comments are what make this site a community. Please provide your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
